Auguro vs Checkly
The closest thing to a real competitor, and the comparison we take most seriously. The difference is who writes the check.
Where Checkly is the better answer
Checkly is genuinely excellent, and the honest comparison. Real Playwright, monitoring as code, multi-step flows, logins, checkouts. If you need to assert that a seven-step signup still works, use Checkly.
Where it leaves you exposed
You have to write and maintain that Playwright. Every check is a small codebase, and small codebases rot. Most sites never write the second check.
GET https://yoursite.com
200 OK ยท 84ms
All systems operational
Nothing. The page is blank.
Side by side
| Checkly | Auguro | |
|---|---|---|
| Real browser | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-step flows and logins | Yes | No |
| Monitoring as code | Yes | No |
| Checks you have to write yourself | All of them | None |
| Time to first useful check | An afternoon | A URL |
| Per-seat charges | Yes | Never |
So which one
Checkly is a better product for testing user journeys. Auguro is a better product for the checks you would never get around to writing. Plenty of teams should run both.
One check free, forever. No card, no scripts to write.
Auguro